Conventional (Allopathic) and Holistic Approaches: A Comparison

Conventional Western Approaches vs. Holistic

The Conventional Western (allopathic) model

Conventional western health practices (known as allopathic) approach our physical maladies and symptoms separately and individually - addressing one issue at a time.

Maybe you’ve experienced the frustration with this system of thinking as you wonder why your endocrinologist doesn’t have the notes from your last appointment with your psychiatrist. If you’ve ever wondered why am I seeing 6 different doctors when there’s one me?

This approach is out of date. It was built on the concept of acute care, when we were historically fighting mostly infectious diseases and acute injuries. And that made sense - at the time.

But welcome to the 21st century where the major epidemics hitting us are chronic diseases and illness with their root causes in lifestyle factors. This old paradigm isn’t working for our current health challenges as is evidenced by a global population that is getting more sick every year, not healthier.

There are some fantastic resources here that also explore the impact our current healthcare models have on our economy, climate, and future generations.

A Holistic model

Alternatively, a holistic approach views symptoms as connected, allowing us to look for the root cause instead of taking a Band-Aid approach to individual symptoms. This approach not only allows you to reach an improved outcome sooner, but ensures long-term health and happiness that is not dependent on expensive and side-effect-producing prescriptions and a revolving door of medical procedures.

The body is incredibly complex and when we view all our natural systems (digestive, respiratory, immune, nervous, etc.) through the lens of connectivity and symbiosis, treatments are much more effective and successful at bringing about lasting wellness - and food is the best place to start!